tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-69048538058168521412024-03-06T22:34:32.935-05:00Technology can be funI'm a geek, and since I spend a lot of my time being asked technology questions already I figured I may as well document my thoughts and insights somewhere.
I hope you find it useful.Michael Babcockhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17706672245403460737noreply@blogger.comBlogger30125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6904853805816852141.post-85425812617137767802011-02-25T01:17:00.001-05:002011-02-25T01:21:18.842-05:00Tablet computing then and now<P>People who've known me a while usually know me as a computer guy. Back in the mid to late nineties, this was especially apparent because I carried this odd looking hand-held computer around with me -- the Apple <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton_%28platform%29">Newton MessagePad</a>.</P>
<P>This is long before Apple started work on the iPhone or even iTunes, and most certainly before the iPad, but the functionality was incredible for the time and when I pull it out and play with it from time to time I'm reminded there are features still not well replicated on modern devices.</P>
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/mikebabcock/5475862382/" title="Newton vs Android by Mike Babcock, on Flickr"><img alt="Newton vs Android" height="240" src="http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5293/5475862382_378beb8bcb_m.jpg" width="216" style="float:right" /></a>
<P>Sure, my new Dell Streak (shown overlapping my MessagePad 120 here) is in full colour, has Wifi, 3G and Bluetooth, but neither Android nor iOS replicate some of the core functionality found on a Newton.</P>
<P>I could pull up the notepad screen for instance and write out (in longhand) "Remember Cindy's birthday next Wednesday" and then click the 'Assist' button on the screen to have the Newton open the calendar, scroll to next Wednesday, and create a day-long reminder named "Cindy's Birthday". Other functionality such as customized business card styles on a per-contact basis were very nice for personalizing individual contacts. It understood the difference between business entries ("Microsoft Support") and people ("Bill Gates").</P>
<div align="center">
<script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "ca-pub-1435901886519725";
/* 300x250 image or text ads for techblog */
google_ad_slot = "0556763289";
google_ad_width = 300;
google_ad_height = 250;
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script>
</div>
<P>I could start drawing free-hand on the notepad screen and it would interpret the shapes I was drawing -- freehand circles became perfectly round (and had editable edges that could be dragged to accurately fix sizing), lines and other shapes properly aligned and closed, etc.</P>
<P>Do I want to go back to using it for my day to day routine? Of course not, its slow and bulky compared to modern devices. But do I wonder why after fifteen years I don't have functional handwriting recognition and basic AI on my new tablet phone? I sure do.</P>Michael Babcockhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17706672245403460737noreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6904853805816852141.post-32873931145670147462011-02-16T13:32:00.000-05:002011-02-16T13:32:04.897-05:00Bandwidth lies and video streamingI have the joy of living in a great forward thinking country with excellent amenities and pretty good access to services. I love my country, I'm Canadian through and through. I've gotta say though, like any one else, I get a little annoyed when my tax dollars get spent on utter stupidity. For example, an arm's length regulator like the CRTC that has far exceeded its mandate and is trying to regulate things like whether Bell Canada can impose their bandwidth usage limits on third parties who access their system. This has been in the media lately as Usage Based Billing.<br />
<br />
First, we need to define the situation. Many people don't understand how this works, so I'll try to explain. High speed phone line internet service (ADSL/DSL) requires that your Internet provider (ISP) be able to communicate at very high speeds over your phone line. This requires that they have equipment connected as physically close as possible to your home.<br />
<br />
Since your local phone company owns the copper lines where you live (probably Bell), your Internet provider needs to work out an arrangement with them to offer you Internet service over those lines. Now if Bell were just another company that had private property involved, this would all seem much more simple, but that's not the case. Bell has over the years been given fantastic amounts of taxpayer money by the government to help them provide phone service to Canadians. As a result of this government-granted monopoly on the service, they're required to allow third-party Internet providers to use those lines at a fair price.<br />
<br />
As it stands however, the price Bell charges a third-party ISP is not fair. And on top of that, with the recent request the CRTC granted, Bell gets to impose bandwidth limits on those ISPs who then end up having to pass them on to you. Here's the rub: it costs Bell nothing to handle your Internet for that ISP. Bell has equipment they're renting out to your Internet provider, and the Internet service itself is 100% handled by your ISP. Bell's feelings about your Internet usage shouldn't be relevant at all.<br />
<br />
I'm glad some in our government understand how unfair and incredibly biased the CRTC decision was and have vowed to overturn it. If the CRTC is going to regulate anything with regards to Internet billing, maybe they should look at usage limits ISPs impose unfairly on consumers in the first place. But that's another issue altogether.<br />Michael Babcockhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17706672245403460737noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6904853805816852141.post-85858956764948185142011-02-15T12:00:00.001-05:002011-02-15T12:05:17.757-05:00Open is better than closed<P>I like open systems, I prefer them, for a few reasons. I use both open and closed systems by necessity, but I prefer open. If your'e totally lost, in the software and hardware world, we consider platforms and systems to be closed when they're only managed by a private entity. A system is open when it can be changed or edited or modified by anyone. Some systems are also called open because their specifications are fully published and not hidden. This isn't what I'm talking about though.</P>
<P>In this case, the open system of the day is Android's phone and tablet platform. The closed system it takes on is Apple's iOS. Totally ignoring Apple's product for a moment, because you're all aware of it I'm sure, lets look at some interesting things happening on the Anrdoid front.</P>
<div align="center">
<script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "ca-pub-1435901886519725";
/* blog_tech_droid */
google_ad_slot = "4755877783";
google_ad_width = 250;
google_ad_height = 250;
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script>
</div>
<P>LG has created an <a href="http://androidheadlines.com/2011/02/lg-optimus-3d-makes-us-see-double.html">Android phone with full 3D</a> display and true 3D camera with dual lenses. It can create and display full 3D content. Instead of inventing their own competitor to the iPhone, software and all, they were able to just create hardware capable of doing what they envisioned and then modifying Android to understand their hardware.</P>
<P>Elsewhere, Android devices are being made <a href="http://androidheadlines.com/2010/08/military-tactical-handset-running-android.html">hardened for Military use</a>. This isn't a market most consumers care about, but it allows the Military contractors to use a known platform for their hardware and save effort on that front, while creating something familiar for the soldier.</P>
<P>The argument against open platforms like Android is so-called fragmentation. That the system isn't static, that it changes from device to device. This makes it moderately harder to write software for the system and to maintain the operating system (Android) itself. The benefits outweigh this issue, in my mind.</P>
<P>Will Apple release a 3D camera and display for their iPhone? Perhaps. What if you don't feel like paying for that feature if and when they did? They might make two versions, but then there'd be fragmentation on their platform too. They might force everyone into the 3D version, in which case you lose the cost-saving choice. They might ignore 3D as a platform, and lose you the option of having it.</P>
<P>Personally, I prefer dealing with companies that offer me choices and create devices that entice me personally but also don't limit my options. That means even if an iPhone did everything I wanted it to do, being dependent on Apple to maintain it in the future is a problem for me. As the twice owner of Newton Messagepads, I'm well aware of how Apple maintains products it stops caring about.</P>Michael Babcockhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17706672245403460737noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6904853805816852141.post-1276768755295603562009-06-03T18:15:00.006-04:002009-06-03T18:31:04.283-04:00My poor eyes, Sony!<P>So its <a href="http://www.e3expo.com">E3</a> this week and all the major console makers are announcing their new gaming hardware or software and Sony has thoughtfully decided to put E3 announcements and trailers up for download in HD on their Store interface from the PS3/PSP. For some reason however, they've changed the background to be mostly white so that the list interface is now essentially white on white making it practically illegible on my very bright HD CRT. The normally slick and easy to use interface is almost impossible to read now:</P>
<div align="center"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/mikebabcock/3593732038/" title="PSN E3 Store by Mike Babcock, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2446/3593732038_22bf08573d_m.jpg" width="240" height="145" alt="PSN E3 Store" /></a></div>
<P>Excuse the redraw effect, its hard to take photos of a CRT and I was in a rush to get this posted. You know, there's <a href="http://homepage.mac.com/bradster/iarchitect/shame.htm">a place</a> for interfaces like this. I'll have comments about what I see when I figure out what I've chosen to download and can see again.</P>Michael Babcockhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17706672245403460737noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6904853805816852141.post-62352601136618666502009-02-17T14:00:00.007-05:002009-02-17T14:20:41.347-05:00Privacy while surfing<P>A Canadian judge recently ruled that police <a href="http://www.nationalpost.com/news/story.html?id=1285658">did not need a warrant</a> to request the information on an Internet subscriber from an ISP based on their IP address. The judge said that one's actions on the Internet have no expectation of privacy.</P>
<div style="float: left; margin-right: 2px;">
<script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-1435901886519725";
/* techblog in-paragraph ads 120x240 */
google_ad_slot = "4805820928";
google_ad_width = 120;
google_ad_height = 240;
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script>
</div>
<P>Most people I know would be very unnerved to think their behaviour online is somehow public data, or that their surfing habits could be linked back to them with a simple unwarranted request. While the case in question was one of child pornography for which many would feel this action was justified, the judge's ruling did not take this into any consideration as far as I noticed and as such this warrantless personal data request may be repeated for any type of online investigation. I am not a lawyer mind you.</P>
<P>Some people have been asking what the difference is between an IP address and a physical address. Everyone should expect their phone number or address will lead back to their personal information via a simple reverse directory of course. As <a href="http://news.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1126991&cid=26891085">I said</a> on a discussion about this story on Slashdot though,</P>
<blockquote>One of the primary differences is that IP addresses are left behind as cookie crumbs everywhere you go online. In real life, you wouldn't leave your home address and telephone number on business cards laying on the street at every intersection with a date/time stamp indicating that you'd been there, would you?<br />
While the type of information seems similar, the resulting availability of personal behaviour data that is discoverable as a result is unnerving.</blockquote>
<P>While I feel that most peoples' behaviour on the Internet is reckless an that people should take their personal information more seriously (by using encryption on E-mails, anonymizing proxy servers, etc.), I think the very fact that people do not take this seriously is proof that there <em>is</em>, contrary to this judge's opinion, an expectation of privacy online, however unwarranted.</P>Michael Babcockhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17706672245403460737noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6904853805816852141.post-55079265297017658182009-02-05T11:51:00.006-05:002009-02-05T14:16:33.421-05:00The great DTV transition<P>So you have a kitchen with several ovens. You make roasts in those ovens, but your roasting pans are huge, and you could really get away with smaller ones. You decide you'd like to be able to fit two or three roasts in each oven instead of one, by using smaller roasting pans. Not too difficult is it?</P>
<P>Just like the old roasting pans, analog TV signals take up a lot of 'space' in the radio spectrum used for broadcast television. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_television">Digital TV</a> signals take up less, because of the ability to compress the data somewhat and other efficiencies. Unfortunately, unlike roasting pans, switching signal types means breaking all the TVs in America. Not as easy of a choice.</P>
<P>The FCC and government decided that to make room available for more high definition broadcast programming, the switch to Digital TV ought to be made. Industry groups didn't want to change, people don't like change, but its a good change to make eventually, so they went ahead and set a deadline -- February 17th, 2009 in the United States of America. As of today, most people don't seem to yet be ready for the transition or don't understand what it is or what they need to do so Congress <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10156931-38.html?tag=nl.e703">has agreed to delay</a> it until June 12th of this year. In Canada, this isn't relevant until August of 2011.</P>
<P>There will be more annoying commercials until then, referencing the <a href="http://www.dtv.gov/">government's website</a> about the transition. There will be retailers griping and consumers worrying, but its all very simple really: it probably doesn't matter to you.</P>
<script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-1435901886519725";
/* 300x250 for tech blog insert */
google_ad_slot = "0448464037";
google_ad_width = 300;
google_ad_height = 250;
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script>
<P>Do you have satellite TV, or cable? Then it doesn't matter, breathe a sigh of relief and ignore all the commercials and warnings.</P>
<P>If you don't have either satellite or cable, you're watching TV through an antenna (either built-in or not). In that case, if you have it nearby or can find a copy elsewhere, check your TV's manual to see if it has an "ATSC" tuner. If it only has an "NTSC" one, you don't have digital TV support on it, and will need a digital tv 'box' unless you want to buy a new TV. No ATSC tuner, no free TV after June 12th.</P>
<P>If you can't find the manual for your TV, and you don't have satellite or cable, and you're worried you won't be able to watch TV, then call the manufacturer of your TV and ask them. The technicians at Sony or Panasonic or whomever should be able to assist you.</P>
<P>Now there are a whole bunch of other issues involved in the switch to digital, but very few of them will be beneficial to you, the consumer. Mostly, this is to make the FCC's and other regulators' lives easier and they threw a bone or two to the broadcasters as well to grease things along.</P>Michael Babcockhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17706672245403460737noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6904853805816852141.post-48075076824686162412008-10-29T23:20:00.004-04:002008-12-03T14:59:09.981-05:00Little Big Awesome Planet<P>Okay so its <a href="http://littlebigplanet.com">Little Big Planet</a>, but its pretty awesome, actually. A 3D sorta 2D platformer puzzle game with layered depth and online scores and collaboration and gestures.</P>
<P>Yes, gestures. Playing a game and being able to make your character dance or give thumbs up or stick his tongue out is remarkably entertaining on its own. Even more so when playing in a group with friends online.</P>
<div style="float: left">
<script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-1435901886519725";
/* techblog in-paragraph ads 120x240 */
google_ad_slot = "4805820928";
google_ad_width = 120;
google_ad_height = 240;
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script>
</div>
<P>Now, I've got a little more LBP experience than many people these first few days after its launch since I was in on the beta and got to play it with friends and family then too. My daughter is only 6 and loved it, especially playing community levels and then assigning words to describe them.</P>
<P>The community aspect of the game is very well done, and this is most apparent by how upset everyone was the last day or so with the servers not connecting well -- it really affects things being able to play together and share levels.</P>
<P>Yes, you can create your own levels, with logic and puzzles and stories and characters and movement and vehicles and and and ... its very complex and huge and entertaining if you're the creative type.</P>
<P>Speaking of playing online though, in case anyone else ran into this problem, I had to port forward UDP port 56759 on my router to my PS3 to invite friends into my session. It would appear LBP doesn't make use of UPnP port forwarding functionality, which is somewhat disappointing.</P>
<div align="center">
<script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-1435901886519725";
/* 300x250 image or text ads for techblog */
google_ad_slot = "0556763289";
google_ad_width = 300;
google_ad_height = 250;
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script>
</div>Michael Babcockhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17706672245403460737noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6904853805816852141.post-38708790193019425772008-08-16T18:38:00.002-04:002008-08-16T18:59:10.268-04:00Criterion treats you right<P><a href="http://www.criteriongames.com">Criterion Games</a> loves their users, its obvious. Not only have they committed to "a year of Burnout", a year of updates and free additional features to their beautiful Burnout Paradise, but they keep improving the game's quality and distribution as well.</P>
<P>On the PS3 they've added proper 1080i support, using the processor to render the game at 720p and 1080i (and also added better 480p support for those pre-HD people). On both the PS3 and 360 they've added additional online content, and rules updates and a new news and calendar system. They're soon releasing their next major content update featuring bikes (motorcycles, not cyclists) and they're working on a <a href="http://www.criteriongames.com/article.php?artID=219">new island</a> full of additional content too, all for free.</P>
<P>As if all this weren't enough, and in case they weren't selling enough copies already, they've <a href="http://blog.us.playstation.com/2008/08/14/burnout-paradise-coming-to-psn/">now announced</a> on the official <A href="http://blog.us.playstation.com">Playstation blog</a> that they'll be releasing the full game as a download from the PSN store for just under $30 so you won't need a disc copy at all.</P>
<div style="float: right">
<script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-1435901886519725";
/* techblog in-paragraph ads 120x240 */
google_ad_slot = "4805820928";
google_ad_width = 120;
google_ad_height = 240;
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script>
</div>
<P>No, I don't know how big the download will be (although since the full game also ships for the 360 on DVD, it must be under 9GiB, not including updates). Yes, it is very clear for those who haven't played the game yet that the content on the disc version and the download version will be the same, that updates are available to both and that the motorcyle pack and coming trophy update are not for the download version only, so don't worry.</P>
<P>The question is, can I find someone to buy my disc copy for $30 so I can purchase the downloadable one and not need to put the disc in each time I want to play. I already play Warhawk this way, and I love my other downloaded games like Super Stardust HD for this too. I must say though, even though I upgraded my PS3 hard disk to a 120GiB 7200RPM model, its almost full again. Time to upgrade again.</P>Michael Babcockhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17706672245403460737noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6904853805816852141.post-47598249191378753922008-08-14T22:30:00.003-04:002008-08-14T22:33:47.573-04:00Sometimes users are fun<P>Anyone who works in technical support is familiar with some of the incredibly funny situations that can arise on the phone when dealing with customers. I was recently shown an <a href="http://rinkworks.com/stupid/">entire website of computer stupidities</a>, many of which made me laugh out loud, for real. Take a look, unless you've called tech support because you don't understand your computer, in which case you may find yourself on the list.</P>
<blockquote>
<ul>
<li>Customer: "I lost some of my files. I archived them, but when I went to retrieve them, they were gone!"</li>
<li>Tech Support: "What program did you use to archive your files?"</li>
<li>Customer: "I used DOS -- but now I can't find them!"</li>
<li>Tech Support: "Ok, what program are you using to do this?"</li>
<li>Customer: "I used 'undelete', but they aren't there."</li>
<li>Tech Support: "Uh...what command did you use to archive your files?"</li>
<li>Customer: "I used 'del' and the filename."</li>
</ul>
It turned out that the guy had been deleting files, which would free up disk space (he liked that), and when he wanted a file again, he would undelete it. Apparently he actually got away with this for a while, until he discovered 'defrag', which overwrote his deleted files.
</blockquote>
<P>If you have your own stories, make sure to share.</P>Michael Babcockhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17706672245403460737noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6904853805816852141.post-37754840041329342932008-08-07T15:57:00.004-04:002008-08-16T18:54:00.886-04:00Home, its real, honest<P>There's <a href="http://techblog.mikebabcock.ca/2008/06/open-letter-to-ps3-haters.html">no secret</a> to the fact that I enjoy my Playstation 3 immensely, but the long drawn out
saga that has been Sony's new Home feature is almost embarrassing at this point. Announced well
over a year ago, Sony promised an open Beta by last summer and that never materialized.
A website purporting to have instructions 'soon' about how to enter the beta process is now very
stale. Some users who got into the closed beta have been leaking information about the state
of Home as it goes along, but Sony has been very tight-lipped about it.</P>
<div align="center">
<script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-1435901886519725";
/* 300x250 image or text ads for techblog */
google_ad_slot = "0556763289";
google_ad_width = 300;
google_ad_height = 250;
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script>
</div>
<P>Well now it seems there's <a href="http://blog.us.playstation.com/2008/08/07/want-into-the-playstation-home-closed-beta-test-heres-how-to-apply/">a new way</a> to get into the beta testing, if you're wanting to do that. Simply download the new PS Home theme from the Playstation Store tonight and you'll be entered automatically. I'm sure quite a few people will jump at that opportunity, despite not knowing the size of this lottery nor how many will make it. I know I will.</P>Michael Babcockhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17706672245403460737noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6904853805816852141.post-49269236282321103372008-07-18T00:01:00.003-04:002008-07-18T10:50:25.255-04:00Elefunk is pretty cool<P>It was only five dollars. It also looked cool, but for $5 how can you go wrong? I'm slightly disappointed it didn't come with trophy support, and like several other PSN games, it could use some help with its leader board display (take some hints from Super Stardust and Super Rub a Dub people), but its pretty fun.</P>
<P>Sorry, let me back up a moment, we're talking Elefunk. Its a cute new physics / engineering puzzle game featuring elephants trying to cross bridges that badly need some support upgrades. You add trusses, supports, ropes, wires, spans, etc. in an attempt to make them withstand the weight of the elephants (and other critters) as they cross. You're also trying to beat the clock and use as few pieces as possible if you want a high score.</P>
<P>The game plays quite well. Its not as complex as a bridge building simulator I once tried for kicks, but it appears to have some decent physics as they're implemented for the game. Note, as the game points out, that only joints can break -- pieces in between joints simply detach from said joints. Also, joints are always mobile; you can't make a nice solid beam 20 units wide, its like you've strung them together with putty instead of a good weld, but once you get the hang of it, its quite entertaining.</P>
<div style="float: right">
<script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-1435901886519725";
/* 120x90 links */
google_ad_slot = "6970414744";
google_ad_width = 120;
google_ad_height = 90;
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script>
</div>
<P>Have I beaten it yet? Nope. Got through the first few levels (up to one called something like "this is going to be tricky") before deciding to quit for the evening. I'll definitely go back and try levels over to do them faster or more efficiently, although it would be nice to see the stress on your joints in some type of colour coding before they break, to judge how close you got to failure. Also, trophies. Small puzzle games should all feature trophies.</P>
<P>The verdict? Definitely worth $5. Needs in-game music. Needs trophies. Very replayable. Could use higher resolution graphics -- somewhat blurry to me, not as sharp as Super Stardust for example. Music is so so, but crisp and fairly well recorded.</P>Michael Babcockhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17706672245403460737noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6904853805816852141.post-80263625353201054212008-07-15T16:36:00.002-04:002008-07-15T16:42:44.613-04:00Sony E3 PSP video announcement<P>So it would seem that Sony has <a href="http://blog.us.playstation.com/2008/07/15/playstation-press-conference-liveblog-e3-2008/">just announced</a> their new downloadable video content for the store is to be available tonight, and transferable to the PSP. Its not quite <a href="http://techblog.mikebabcock.ca/2008/07/psp-wishlist.html">my wishlist item</a>, but its very cool nonetheless. From their live casting of the presentation:</P>
<blockquote>
<ul>
<li>12.23 - Jack talks about the new video download service. On Day 1 - Sony Pictures, Fox, MGM, Lions Gate, Warner Brothers, Disney, and more will have content available. A huge differentiator - you can take movies and tv on the go via PSP.</li>
<li>12.25 - Eric Lempel takes the stage (you remember him, right), to show a live demo of the video download service - it’s part of the existing PLAYSTATION Store - there’s a new video tab. Each studio has a page. Eric shows how to buy, rent, or preview a movie.</li>
<li>12.29 - “How long will it take to download an SD movie?” The answer is about an hour for a 2 hour movie. However, with progressive downloading, you can begin watching your video almost instantaneously.</li>
<li>12.30 - Eric demonstrates how to copy movies to the PSP. You can do this either through a PS3, or through the PC Store. BTW, this video download service will be available TONIGHT (applause). We’ll be adding new titles each week.</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
<P>You have to admit that's pretty cool. Its not exactly Netflix on the 360, but its a good start, and we'll see how it goes. Having PSP integration for watching movies on the go is awesome though.</P>Michael Babcockhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17706672245403460737noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6904853805816852141.post-34311554849254062812008-07-15T11:32:00.004-04:002008-08-16T18:54:35.866-04:00PSP wishlist<P>I'm the happy owner of a <a href="http://blog.mikebabcock.ca/2008/03/kratos-psp-coming-soon.html">red Kratos PSP</a>, which I got for Father's day (and half for my birthday). I've been enjoying it quite a bit, playing the included God of War game, ignoring the bundled Super Bad movie on UMD, and trying to wrestle it back from my wife as she works her way through Patapon. I have been playing with Remote Play and picture viewing and loving the screen for showing off photos and home videos.</P>
<P>I have, however, come up with some features that I would love to see addressed in the future, and hopefully they will be implemented some day:</P>
<UL>
<LI>Saving of music/videos/pictures viewed via remote play to the connected PSP.</LI>
<LI>Optional resizing and transcoding of video/music/photos to the screen resolution of the PSP. The PS3 should be able to easily transcode video it supports into video the PSP can play and transmit the result.</LI>
<LI>Full-time wifi scanner that constantly updates the wifi visibility list until it is stopped instead of timing out and requiring a re-scan.</LI>
<LI>Bluetooth support for two-way headsets as well as headphones and file transfers with cell phones, mini keyboards, etc.</LI>
<LI>The RSS features from the PSP implemented on the PS3.</LI>
<LI>Downloadable day planner and IMAP E-mail applications. VNC viewer if you really want to make me happy.</LI>
</UL>
<div align="center">
<script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-1435901886519725";
/* 300x250 image or text ads for techblog */
google_ad_slot = "0556763289";
google_ad_width = 300;
google_ad_height = 250;
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script>
</div>
<P>There it is, if you have any suggestions, feel free to add them as comments below.</P>Michael Babcockhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17706672245403460737noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6904853805816852141.post-64714164471587072812008-07-04T10:08:00.006-04:002008-07-04T10:21:04.110-04:00Geeking out Linux style<P>Every following has its events, whether its Daytona and Indianapolis for their respective racing fans, or conventions for various sci-fi followings. As a <a href="http://mikebabcock.ca/me/">computer geek</a> who's bent on using Linux everywhere, the one I'll be at this summer is the <a href="http://www.linuxsymposium.org">Ottawa Linux Symposium</a> later this month.</P>
<P>The Symposium brings together <a href="http://mikebabcock.ca/linux">Linux</a> people of all areas of expertise including simple fans and programmers, kernel hackers and company reps. As a simpleton myself by comparison, I enjoy hobnobbing with the likes of file system designers and SCSI engineers. The <a href="http://www.linuxsymposium.org/2008/schedule.php">list of events</a> this year is quite impressive, with some very interesting topics including SELinux and Bluetooth audio streaming, energy management, mobile devices and BitTorrent distribution, it should be a very enlightening extended weekend.</P>
<P>My employer has paid for me to attend (I am after all a Linux system administrator and programmer for a living), but I'll be covering my personal, travel and hotel costs. Since it happens that the convention falls on the week of my wife's birthday and a week before our 10th anniversary, we're making an outing of it and having ourselves a little vacation too. No, my wife probably won't attend any of the events (and isn't registered to do so anyway), but she did enjoy meeting some interesting people last time we attended, and getting to ride in a home-made electric car (something Mazda hadn't intended for their Miata, I'm sure).</P>
<P>Since my fellow geeks at the convention will have the building wired for wireless (lol), I may be blogging random updates as they happen starting July 22nd. Check this space for more details, with the tag OLS2008.</P>
<div align="center">
<script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-1435901886519725";
/* 300x250 image or text ads for techblog */
google_ad_slot = "0556763289";
google_ad_width = 300;
google_ad_height = 250;
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script>
</div>Michael Babcockhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17706672245403460737noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6904853805816852141.post-74033540236594216272008-07-03T15:12:00.005-04:002008-07-03T16:26:33.388-04:00In-game XMB will have to wait<P>Well it would appear that Sony <a href="http://techblog.mikebabcock.ca/2008/06/in-game-xmb-ruins-blog.html">heeded my advice</a> and took down the PS3 2.40 patch. Now, <a href="http://blog.us.playstation.com/2008/07/02/firmware-v240-status/">according to Sony</a>, it wasn't to give us something to complain about, but rather because people were complaining anyway. It seems the firmware didn't take for all users, and gave a few some problems, so they took it back down for debugging. Maybe it'll be back up soon, maybe not.</P>
<div align="center">
<script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-1435901886519725";
/* 300x250 image ads for blog */
google_ad_slot = "1820021381";
google_ad_width = 300;
google_ad_height = 250;
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script>
</div>
<P>Personally, I was somewhat anxious to check out trophies so I was online Wednesday morning checking for the update and got it just fine, as well as the Super Stardust update with Trophy support. I've been working on unlocking them ever since (PSN ID Maluraq if you'd like to compare).</P>
<P>The in-game XMB access is pretty cool and very smooth I might add. Its not as fast as when you're not playing a game, but I can scroll through my trophies and friends list and look at music titles and such while a car slowly rotates in the background (the live 'screensaver' view from Gran Turismo 5: Prologue). In fact, that's what most impressed me -- the XMB does not automatically pause the game that you're playing, but instead leaves it running (unless the game itself chooses to pause as a result) which makes for some cool background graphics in the case of GT5:P or when running Folding@Home.</P>
<P>I'll be getting those trophies before anyone else can while you guys wait for the firmware to be available again :-)</P>Michael Babcockhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17706672245403460737noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6904853805816852141.post-41432436441853185632008-06-30T17:54:00.002-04:002008-06-30T18:00:06.847-04:00In-game XMB ruins blog<P>Seriously, now what will the readers of Sony's <a href="http://blog.us.playstation.com">official blog</a> whine about? In case you haven't heard, Sony has announced the much-anticipated Playstation 3 firmware <a href="http://techblog.mikebabcock.ca/2008/03/point-releases.html">version 2.40</a> for July 2nd of this year (that's 2008 for you time-travelers). The <a href="http://blog.us.playstation.com/2008/06/29/firmware-v240-walkthrough-part-1-the-xmb/">first video</a> details the in-game XMB feature, allowing contact with other gamers as well as some settings and direct launching of other games from within a first game and <a href="http://blog.us.playstation.com/2008/06/30/firmware-v240-walkthrough-part-2-trophies/">the second</a> introduces the new trophy system.</P>
<P>Trophies, I'm excited about. In-game XMB, only so much but being able to set up my bluetooth headset while already in-game (Warhawk!) would be much appreciated. I can't wait to check my friends to see what they've actually achieved in some games, and to compare our mad skillz. I hope that already released games with built-in accomplishments of various forms will port their old rewards to the new trophy system though (I mean you, Insomniac and Naughty Dog).</P>
<P>Well, here's to seeing what the next big complaint will be.</p>Michael Babcockhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17706672245403460737noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6904853805816852141.post-29399407966667446302008-06-26T10:23:00.004-04:002008-06-26T10:39:31.627-04:00Open letter to PS3 haters<p>What is with you haters? The PS3 has quite a few good games, none of which required Sony to pay anyone anything. Microsoft is the one who pays for exclusives, not Sony. Microsoft bought all of Bungie back in the day to keep Halo exclusive even.</p>
<p>Resistance, Resistance 2 and Ratchet & Clank are exclusives for the PS3 from Insomniac Games. Drake's Fortune is a gorgeous exclusive from Naughty Dog. Heavenly Sword is exclusive and very fun, Warhawk is exclusive and I love the excellent online 32 player battles. Metal Gear Solid 4 is one of the best games of the year, easily, and is exclusive to the PS3 (good luck making a 50GiB game on the 360).</p>
<p>As others have pointed out, a number of the new games are being designed directly for the PS3 now and then being ported to the XBox 360, not the other way around (like <a href="http://digg.com/gaming_news/LucasArts_to_Develop_for_PS3_Port_to_360">LucasArts</a>. That includes <a href="http://www.ps3fanboy.com/2007/11/30/burnout-paradise-ps3-development-makes-better-360-game/">Burnout Paradise</a>, which is <a href="http://blog.us.playstation.com/2008/06/23/new-burnout-paradise-updates-coming-to-ps3/">including software scaling</a> for 1080i support on the PS3 in their next update without losing their 60fps speed, because the Cell has a lot of power left over.</p>
<P>Do I love my PS3? Yes. Do I have anything against the 360? Not really -- but the 9GiB disc limit is a pain, although XBL and achievements are pretty cool. As far as achievements go though, most of the games I like playing have them built-in anyway (see list above) so its not really relevant to me. Just stop claiming the PS3 has no good games, just like the 360 had no good games when it launched either.</P>Michael Babcockhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17706672245403460737noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6904853805816852141.post-87227517325561474562008-06-24T16:41:00.004-04:002008-06-24T21:04:09.852-04:00Feeling the Escher love<P>Well if you've been following this blog (and I can't imagine why you wouldn't), you'd know I love the PSN downloadable game <a href="http://www.us.playstation.com/PS3/Games/echochrome">Echochrome</a>. If you didn't read my <a href="http://techblog.mikebabcock.ca/2008/05/echochrome.html">previous post</a> about this game, Echochrome is a cool little 2D/3D black and white puzzle game reminiscent of (and inspired by) M.C. Escher's impossible geometry paintings.</P>
<P>One of the interesting features of Echochrome (and one of the primary reasons I bought it) is that it includes a level editor that allows you to <a href="http://blog.us.playstation.com/2008/05/04/echochrome-no-end-in-sight/">create your own levels</a> which you can then send to friends on the Playstation Network or upload to the servers of the game designers for review and possible inclusion in future updates.</P>
<div style="float: right">
<script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-1435901886519725";
/* techblog in-paragraph ads 120x240 */
google_ad_slot = "4805820928";
google_ad_width = 120;
google_ad_height = 240;
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script>
</div>
<P>I'll admit, I haven't played the game for as many hours as I thought I might, partly due to being busy, partly because Burnout Paradise and Hot Shots Golf were taking up so much of my time, and partly because some of the more difficult levels required me to take a mental break after beating them. That said, I found myself dreaming up new and interesting level shapes I could build in the level editor. I made four or five basic levels, nothing too fancy, just to try out my skills and figure out the controls and possibilities afforded me. I uploaded the few that seemed to work as I figured, "why not share?"</P>
<P>So just today I see that the Echochrome devs have <a href="http://blog.us.playstation.com/2008/06/24/north-american-made-echochrome-levels-on-the-way">posted on the Playstation Blog</a> and that there are 30 new levels coming to the game from North America (the USA, Canada and Malta in fact) in the next downloadable update and I figure "ah, some new content" and figured I ought to browse the <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/playstationblog/sets/72157605795280715">level diagrams on Flickr</a> and see what's new and interesting. Well imagine my surprise as I'm scrolling through the photos and I recognize <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/playstationblog/2608170980/">one of my levels</a> is being included in the update, rated a difficulty of 2. A quick "Woohoo!" goes through my head and I call my wife to brag about having made one of the thirty included levels when I notice that <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/playstationblog/2607340573/">another of my levels</a>, this one rated a 3, is also being included.</p>
<P>Yes, I'm bragging. Leave me alone, it feels good. My head should shrink back down by tonight when I'm trying to sneak past the automatic sentry machines in MGS4.</P>Michael Babcockhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17706672245403460737noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6904853805816852141.post-79420109549998766692008-06-09T10:14:00.002-04:002008-06-09T11:07:05.458-04:00Haze fun but not excellent<P>Haze, the PS3-exclusive first person shooter from Free Radical looked like it had potential. For years. I kept seeing previews and hearing about the game, and the game never emerged until it had all but been forgotten. Then it came out to glorious reviews!</P>
<P>Not quite. As <a href="http://www.ps3fanboy.com/2008/05/21/only-the-most-positive-haze-reviews-here/3#comments">ps3fanboy has summarized</a>, there aren't many glowing reviews. Now as some of the comments have pointed out, its competitors have received strangely high review scores (especially on the single player campaigns) -- COD4 and Halo3 come to mind of course.</P>
<P>In fact, if I could convince them to do it, I'd ask reviewers to review the single player campaign game-play and the multi-player sections of games separately. Some games have excellent multiplayer with no single player plot to speak of (or have none at all, like Warhawk).</P>
<P>That aside, what I hated about Haze was the dialogue -- there were moments that were well-written and there was dialogue I could tell they'd put some thought into. Then there was the other 85% which sucked, was poorly timed and didn't advance the story at all (cutting room floor, anyone?). The lack of load times was a complete lie of course, they were just covered up by transport vehicle moments with aforementioned terrible dialogue. I'd rather have a loading screen with a good story insert or a movie clip with background loading personally.</P>
<P>The story, quite honestly, was good but could have been fleshed out better. There should be more attachment time to your own character at the beginning and more AI-driven decision making (to turn or not to turn -- to shoot your own men or not -- to kill rebels or not, etc.). I miss games letting me make decisions. But besides decision making being made for you by the plot, the overtones of the game, the issues of deciding good and evil, the ending especially make this game worth playing.</P>
<P>As far as actual game play goes, its a fun shooter. I have one and only one real beef with the mechanics of the game -- I know why the Mantel soldiers can self-heal, but how is it that after becoming a rebel I can still self-heal without my Mantel suit and drugs? Also, why is there no cover and sneaking mechanic in a game designed around the bold stupidity of the Mantel soldiers? I should be able to sneak up behind one, knock him down, steal his gun and leave without his buddies noticing since they can't see his dead body after ward.</P>
<P>What about the resolution of the game? Well my eyes are very sensitive to low resolutions and that's why I never played FPS games on previous console generations (okay, I played Perfect Dark on the N64) but Haze gets around its low resolutions by having almost all the action up close and personal. There are very few environments that require you to deal with enemies in the distance and therefore the inability to distinguish between a bird a flower and a mantel soldier at 200 yards is less relevant.</P>
<P>Since playing a couple other games recently, Free Radical could have implemented something like Denied Ops' destination designator instead of the over-used compass mechanic to make life easier in some vertical areas too since when you're directly above or below your final destination, the compass heading is not very useful if you can't find the right set of stairs to use to get there.</P>
<P>Overall, it was a fun game. I rented it for $10 and beat it in a week. I played online a bit and it was actually kinda fun, but nothing elaborately exciting. The layouts are not outstanding nor is the use of weapons crates at spawn points. Play it for the single player campaign then go back to your favourite online shooter for multi player.</P>Michael Babcockhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17706672245403460737noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6904853805816852141.post-61874903266761043562008-06-06T09:24:00.002-04:002008-06-06T09:44:18.238-04:00PSN Store Late with Qore, Novastrike<P>As an addendum to <a href="http://blog.mikebabcock.ca/2008/06/sonys-new-qore-service.html">my entry on Qore</a>, its worth noting that the PSN store update didn't happen for on Thursday, at least not in EST and that over 5,000 comments were made to the PSN <a href="http://blog.us.playstation.com/2008/06/05/playstation-store-update-37/">Store update blog entry</a> (which was intermittently unavailable for me this morning). I began my downloads this morning, and will likely have more comments in a new post later.</P>
<P>For now, I'd like to point out that there are some serious cry-babies in the gaming community (as will be evidenced by a reading of the aforementioned Playstation blog. I still see no reason for the hostility some people appear to have toward Qore. Perhaps they spend too much of their time swallowing the opinions of others instead of reading what Qore really is intended to be.</P>
<P>Many people seem under other circumstances to not understand the difference between Sony as a platform maintainer and Sony as a publisher of content, and that may be part of the problem here. Since Sony's publishing the blog and Sony's publishing the PSN store and Sony's publishing this Qore magazine, then it must be the same resources involved in each? Right? Wrong. There's potentially no cross-over in talent or resources at all in fact, much like Sid Meiers probably has nothing to do with the latest Burnout game, despite both being published by EA.</P>
<P>At any rate, I'd love to know the technical reasons for the Store not being updated on time but right now my PS3 is at home happily chugging away downloading several gigabytes of new content, including this month's <a href="http://blog.mikebabcock.ca/2008/06/sonys-new-qore-service.html">episode of Qore</a> and the first self-published title on the PSN, <a href="http://blog.us.playstation.com/2008/06/04/novastrike-invades-psn-this-week/">Novastrike</a>.</P>Michael Babcockhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17706672245403460737noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6904853805816852141.post-13984464173607691232008-05-27T12:10:00.002-04:002008-05-27T12:38:27.986-04:00The raw power of game consoles<P>There is <a href="http://www.tgdaily.com/content/view/37621/128/">an article on tgdaily</a> about the floating-point speed of a number of game consoles for the sake of a raw numbers comparison. They chose to report on the FLOPs each processor can put out, at peak (that would be 'floating operations per second') which is an industry standard measurement for the speed of CPUs in general.<P>
<P>Of course, CPUs for PCs are not frequently measured in FLOPs -- its normally a benchmark associated with raw horsepower type computers like mainframes and supercomputers. The <a href="http://www.top500.org">Top 500 Supercomputers</a> list measures performance in FLOPs (actually, giga and tera FLOPs) of the world's fastest computers.</P>
<P>More thoughts coming ... </P>
<p>My comment from that page for those who don't want to sift through and find it:</P>
<blockquote>
To those who claim this article is biased somehow, you obviously don't understand benchmarking. The whole purpose of the FLOP measurement is the ability to compare different CPU architectures in a meaningful way.<br/>
<br/>
FLOPs are a measurement of performance that does not necessarily reflect how appropriate a given platform is for your software however. The Cell processor in the PS3 is much faster doing Folding@Home calculations than a regular Intel or AMD CPU for example, but isn't well designed for other workloads.<br/>
<br/>
And to the SPU haters, SPUs are FULL processors. Look at their specifications. Their only meaningful limitation is how much memory access they have at any given point in time (without making DMA calls to fetch other data to process).<br/>
<br/>
They are not comparable to FPUs at all.<br/>
</blockquote>Michael Babcockhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17706672245403460737noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6904853805816852141.post-63002569862242282662008-05-01T16:14:00.008-04:002008-05-01T16:34:56.599-04:00Echochrome<P>I love a good puzzle game. I buy those little metal Chinese puzzles whenever possible. My wife is still bitter from the first such 3D puzzle she bought me that I solved in an hour or so. Its just a function of how my brain works, and I really enjoy exercising it. As such, I'm very excited about tonight's release of Echochrome in North America on the PSN (on the Sony Playstation Network Store). Its a very cool 3D puzzle game based lightly on the work of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M._C._Escher">Escher</a>.</P>
<div style="float: right">
<script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-1435901886519725";
/* techblog in-paragraph ads 120x240 */
google_ad_slot = "4805820928";
google_ad_width = 120;
google_ad_height = 240;
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script>
</div>
<P>You basically have control of a 3D view of a simple line-drawn environment with one or more little figures walking around in essentially straight lines on it. There are obstacles and jumping pads and holes in the floor and gaps to cross, all without any direct control of the characters. The really interesting part is that the rotating of the image such that a path looks connected (because the gap is hidden by another piece of the foreground) causes th path to <em>be</em> connected, at least until you rotate it again. The same goes for hiding obstacles or for how jumping and falling work.</P>
<P>Tell you what, try Youtube for a video of it instead, it'll make much more sense.</P>
<div style="clear: right; text-align: center" id='vu_ytplayer_vjVQa1PpcFM_Kd_UKwT7bpf82HkKYUGnOx_R-zv0_YY='><a href='http://www.youtube.com/browse'>Watch the latest videos on YouTube.com</a></div><script type='text/javascript' src='http://www.youtube.com/cp/vjVQa1PpcFM_Kd_UKwT7bpf82HkKYUGnOx_R-zv0_YY='></script>
<P>Now you get it? A little maybe? Very cool, don't you think? Now here's the really cool part -- you can create your own levels in the game, then either share them with friends or upload them directly back to the game makers and let them possibly include your creation(s) in future (free) updates to the game. Check out the <a href="http://blog.us.playstation.com/2008/04/30/echochrome-arrives-tomorrow/">official blog entry</a> for more information.</P>Michael Babcockhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17706672245403460737noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6904853805816852141.post-14301260588593133432008-03-23T13:50:00.007-04:002008-03-23T14:20:21.669-04:00Gaming consoles going nowhere<P>A <a href="http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,1697,2277507,00.asp">recent piece</a> by Alex St. John, an ex-Microsoft worker who was deeply involved in making Windows the preferred platform for gaming back in the 90's and had his fingers in Direct-X and other technologies has predicted the demise of console gaming systems and the rise of PC gaming in the future. Some of you may remember as I do when he wrote a regular ranting but interesting column in the back of Boot magazine, destined to become Maximum PC.</P>
<P>Contrary to how you may interpret my title, and regardless of what you might <a href="http://games.slashdot.org/games/08/03/21/2134239.shtml">read in discussions</a> on Slashdot, I completely disagree for a few simple reasons.</P>
<P>First off, there's the fact that this has been predicted before and not been true. Back when Microsoft introduced the X-box gaming platform, it was trying to prove that PC gaming was as good or better than existing consoles for the same price and so the X-box was basically off-the-shelf PC parts assembled with some extra Copyright protection features to make it usable as a gaming system. It had a PC gaming video card, and a PC hard drive, a PC CPU and a PC-like motherboard with PC-standard USB and a PC-like disc drive, PC-style RAM and unfortunately for Microsoft, PC-like cost to build.</P>
<div style="float:left">
<script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-1435901886519725";
/* techblog para insert links 160x90 */
google_ad_slot = "6812314728";
google_ad_width = 160;
google_ad_height = 90;
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script>
</div>
<P>Microsoft lost a <strong>tonne</strong> of money making and delivering the X-box. When they brought out their quite famous second-generation system, the 360, they even completely ceased sales and support on their original system (unlike Sony with the PSOne and PS2). Although it played games reasonably well, and was a pretty good platform and system, and despite how they'd wooed PC game developers with Direct-X compatibility and an Intel CPU, the system simply wasn't a profitable way to do gaming (for Microsoft). As a testament to this truth, he 360 no longer bears almost any resemblance to its first generation's PC roots using a custom external power brick, a custom PowerPC-based CPU (as their competitors Nintendo and Sony do), and a completely overhauled memory and video architecture. The PC-branded-as-a-console was a financial disaster, and is gone.</P>
<P>So why would someone suddenly believe that a PC as a gaming system would now be more successful? More importantly, what really makes consoles successful? One of the big factors in a gaming console is stability. A game developer making a game for the PC targets a random point in the future, and doesn't know what PCs will be able to do. Their game may require huge new $1000 video cards to run (Crysis) or may look terrible (no comment). Users can't be certain of what they'll need to play the games, although the devout frequently lay out the price of a PS3 for a new video card regularly to keep up.</P>
<div style="float: right">
<script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-1435901886519725";
/* techblog in-paragraph ads 120x240 */
google_ad_slot = "4805820928";
google_ad_width = 120;
google_ad_height = 240;
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script>
</div>
<P>Console game designers have a fixed target. For example, the CPU and HD video card and DVD drive and unified RAM of the X-Box 360, or the Cell processor, HD video card, hard drive, Blu-ray disc, segregated RAM and motion sensitive controller of the PS3, or the CPU, SD video and motion sensing and pointer-like controller of the Wii. They pick a platform, know exactly what they're able to do and are able to perfectly test what the user's experience will be, and then attempt to deliver their game to that audience, knowing mostly what the audience's experience will be like, and not worrying about different capabilities of different 360s, PS3s, or different Wii systems being a problem like PC game developers do.</P>
<P>Now sure, there are advantages to PC game development, such as the constantly higher ceiling of power the systems have for you to work with as a developer. 512MB of RAM one year, 1GB the next, 2GB the next, and so on. There are PC game systems that support up to three video cards now running in parallel for unimaginable graphics power. But consider for a moment which horse you'd place your bets with -- those willing to keep their systems up to date constantly to play the newest games (not to mention dealing with Windows problems, viruses, etc.), or the number able to pick up a Wii controller and play any game they buy with no fuss.</P>
<P>I'm not saying the PC gaming market is going to cease to exist at all, in fact I think it will thrive, but it will become more and more of a niche market as online Java and Flash games take over the low-end and high-end games are only accessible to the most devout gamers while the bulk of games will continue to be produced for gaming consoles of various types.</P>Michael Babcockhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17706672245403460737noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6904853805816852141.post-55380298176750750682008-03-20T16:26:00.009-04:002008-03-23T01:07:49.751-04:00Make money off your blog<P>I <a href="http://techblog.mikebabcock.ca/2008/03/using-haloscan-trackbacks.html">posted recently</a> about using Haloscan's trackback feature on Blogger without all the extras like comments and reviews. What I find even more people are interested in doing is trying to make some extra money on the side, or even have a profitable website or blog. The easiest ways to earn money off your blog or website would be to accept donations, charge for access, use advertising or some combination of the above.</P>
<P>If your blog or website is already popular and content-rich enough to warrant charging for access, you probably wouldn't be reading this, and begging for donations isn't exactly hard, so I'll be focusing on the third option which is using advertising for revenue.</P>
<P>Adding advertising to your blog shouldn't be difficult, and it isn't. The hard way would be to go out and find advertisers interested in putting ads on your blog or website. The smart way would be to have a personal advertising agent who goes and does this leg work for you. The best would be if this agent were completely automated. That agent would be Google Adsense<sup><font size="1">TM</font></sup>.</P>
<div style="float:left; margin-right: 2px">
<script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-1435901886519725";
/* 125x125 adsense referal */
google_ad_slot = "9376415427";
google_ad_width = 125;
google_ad_height = 125;
google_cpa_choice = ""; // on file
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script>
</div>
<P>Google Adsense<sup><font size="1">TM</font></sup> has been around for a while now and is both very easy to sign up for and quite easy to use. In fact, the link to the left for Adsense is itself an Adsense ad inserted into this post with some simple cut'n'paste. With the exception of referrals like that one, what makes Google Adsense<sup><font size="1">TM</font></sup> so interesting is that the ads are automatically chosen for your website based on your site's content as indexed by Google itself. That is to say, if your website is primarily about cars, your ads will probably be about car products. If your site is about gardening, you'll find the ads are relevant to that audience as well. So how do we put some ads up on our site?</P>
<P>The first thing you need to do is visit their site and sign up. If you have an existing Google account for some other purpose, you can simply use that. Once you've signed up, you'll need to start creating ads that you want to place on your blog or website. When you create ads with Adsense (click 'adsense setup' and then 'get ads', then I recommend 'content' ads for the sake of this discussion), you simply choose a colour scheme (either a pre-made one or a custom one of your choosing) and a size and shape of ad. Since Google Adsense<sup><font size="1">TM</font></sup> will be filling in the advertiser content automatically from your content, you do not choose the ads themselves, but a shape of space much like renting out a billboard on the side of a highway.</P>
<P>Pick a size and shape that suits the spot you have in mind for placing an ad. Lets say a wide leaderboard ad for the top of your site or a tower ad for the right column like <a href="http://blog.mikebabcock.ca/">my other blog</a> uses. Once you've created the ad, you will be asked about channels (don't worry about that for now) and then given a piece of HTML code in a little window to cut and paste into your website in the appropriate place.</P>
<P>If you're using Blogger or some other online blog editor, click the 'edit html' option or 'add html' on the layout editor, find a spot where you want the ad to show up, and just paste the code you got in there on a new blank line or in the space provided. If you're accustomed to HTML editing, you can wrap that with a DIV tag or something to place it specifically somewhere else. There, you've added a potential revenue source to your blog already.</P>
<P>"But wait," you say, "I don't see an ad when I look at my website!" No, you probably won't right away. If your blog is new, give it a day or two for Google to index it and figure out what to place there. If you've just created a new Adsense ad type and inserted a new code, it may not show anything for a short while. Don't worry, it should start working within an hour or two. Good luck and hopefully you can earn some money off your site. When you're ready, you can ad some more to your layout (presently up to four standard ads and four text link ads per page) or read some of the Adsense guides and help documents for more information about monetizing your site.</P>
<P>As a final note, in case you didn't read the terms of service on the adsense site when you signed up, you should <strong>never</strong> click your own ads on your site. That can lead to Google shutting off your account for 'cheating'. Any other questions? Put them in the comments below and I'd be glad to respond to any I can.</P>
<div align="center">
<script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-1435901886519725";
/* adsense referal 300x250 */
google_ad_slot = "4698549256";
google_ad_width = 300;
google_ad_height = 250;
google_cpa_choice = ""; // on file
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script>
</div>
<P>See also:</P>
<UL>
<LI><A HREF="http://www.doshdosh.com/blogging-tip-dont-make-the-mistake-of-monetizing-your-blog-too-early/">Don't make the mistake of monetizing your blog too early</A> on Doshdosh.com</LI>
</UL>Michael Babcockhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17706672245403460737noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6904853805816852141.post-49030821666238686162008-03-19T15:09:00.008-04:002008-03-21T14:48:01.313-04:00Using Haloscan TrackbacksTrackbacks are a very cool feature that allow bloggers to essentially reply to an original blog post with a new post of their own. Unfortunately, Blogger doesn't natively support trackback links or trackback pings yet, but there's a free third-party option through <a href="http://www.haloscan.com/">Haloscan</a>.
Unfortunately for those who prefer Blogger's built-in commenting system, Haloscan's automatic installation option replaces the comments with its own when installing its trackback feature. There are several links on how to get around this using 'old blogger', but after much fiddling it is also possible to do it on 'new blogger' as I've done on <a href="http://blog.mikebabcock.ca/">my other blog</a>.
What you need to do is get into your <a href="http://www.blogger.com/home">blogger dashboard</a> and then click <span style="font-weight: bold;">Layout</span> next to your blog. Now click the <span style="font-weight: bold;">Edit HTML</span> option.
At this point you should click on <span style="font-weight: bold;">Download Full Template</span> and save it somewhere safe so you can get it back if you screw it all up trying to follow my directions. Once you have it safely saved, click on the checkbox next to <span style="font-weight: bold;">Expand Widget Templates</span> and wait for the page to finish refreshing. At this point you want to search for something that looks like:<blockquote><pre></head>
<body>
<div id='outer-wrapper'>
</pre></blockquote>Just above the <code></head></code> "tag", paste the following, replacing <code>myhaloscanname</code> with your Haloscan account name:<blockquote><pre>
<!-- for haloscan trackback -->
<script src='http://www.haloscan.com/load/<strong>myhaloscanname</strong>'
type='text/javascript' />
</pre></blockquote>Now you want to scroll down and find (or use your browser's search/find feature to find):<blockquote><pre><span class='post-comment-link'></pre></blockquote>Immediately after the above, before any other tag begins (tags begin with those angle brackets), paste the following:<blockquote><pre><!-- Haloscan -->
<a class='comment-link'
expr:href='"http://www.haloscan.com/tb/<strong>myhaloscanname</strong>/"
+ data:post.id
+ "/"' expr:onclick='"HaloScanTB(" + "\""
+ data:post.id + "\"" + ");return false;"'>
<script
type='text/javascript'>postCountTB(&#39;<data:post.id/>&#39;);</script></a>
</pre></blockquote>Again, replace <code>myhaloscanname</code> above with your Haloscan user account name. If you paste it exactly there, exactly as shown above, and you're very lucky and have a similar template to the one I'm using, it should work just fine. You'll end up with a trackback link for each post, much like on my <a href="http://blog.mikebabcock.ca/">primary blog</a>.
See also:
<UL>
<LI>My <a href="http://techblog.mikebabcock.ca/2008/03/monetizing-your-blog.html">blog entry</a> on monetizing with Adsense</LI>
</UL>
Good luck, and if you have any comments or suggestions, please leave them below.Michael Babcockhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17706672245403460737noreply@blogger.com0